Thanks for sharing your questions here.
On Monday, July 25, 2016 at 8:48:52 AM UTC-4, Khâlid ÊLMERRAH wrote:
-- If you are indeed using SQL lite, the easiest solution may be Cloud SQL given its SQL compatibility. This is essential a managed MySQL database service. The costs would depend on the resources required for this Cloud SQL instance. The pricing can be found here.
Depending on your read/write needs and the structure of your data, you may also want to consider Cloud Datastore. The Datastore has Geographical point type that may be applicable to you. The pricing page can be found here.
To provide more specific recommendations, we would need more information about the needs of your application. For instance:
- What are your data models like?
- What kind of read/write volume do you expect?
- What is your budget?
- Do you intend to have a server-side application to handle these storage reads and writes or issue requests or REST calls directly to the storage medium (Cloud SQL, Cloud Datastore)?
Hope this helps.
On Monday, July 25, 2016 at 8:48:52 AM UTC-4, Khâlid ÊLMERRAH wrote:
hello,i wanna make an android app that stores locations, I've read that it's better to use a SQL lite db but i need a server where to store and sync data out of it.. could u please tell me a recommendation or an idea of what to do .. if google cloud can help.. how much will it coast ? thank you
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Cloud SQL discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-cloud-sql-discuss+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-cloud-sql-discuss/78e65274-84e5-4750-b46d-1da700b32257%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
No comments:
Post a Comment